Editorial Policies
Peer Review Process
All articles submitted to ASIANetwork Exchange are initially assessed by an Editor, who decides whether or not the article is suitable for peer review. Submissions considered suitable for peer review are assigned to one or more independent experts, who assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology.
The journal operates a double-blind peer review process, meaning that reviewers remain anonymous for the review process. The review period is expected to take around four weeks. Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal.
Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a recommendation for rejection, minor or major revisions, or acceptance. Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal’s Editors-in-Chief, who are supported by an expert Editorial Board.
Section Policies
Article
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Book and Media Review
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Special Section Spring 2012: Asian Environments
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Special Section Fall 2013: Asian Environments, Guest Edited by Darrin Magee
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
The Marianna McJimsey Award
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Chinese Philosophers and Western Philosophy
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Teaching Comparative Philosophy
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Gender in Asia
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Buddhism and the Environment
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Vietnam: Memories and Meaning
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Digital Asia
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Corrections
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Centering Korea in the Undergraduate Curriculum
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed